The narrative that "Vice Pays" may only be true for monopolies. A study on "Sin Stocks" (abortion, gambling, pornography) found that while large-cap vice stocks often outperform, **Small-Cap Sin Stocks** consistently underperform. The bottom quartile of sin stocks by market cap generated a negative alpha of **-1.10% per month** (1970–2016). This suggests that without the protection of monopolistic barriers to entry, companies engaging in morally controversial activities suffer from a "Reputation Tax" that destroys shareholder value.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X09000634We view "Sin" as a scale risk. Philip Morris can afford lawsuits; a small tobacco startup cannot. The data shows that for small and mid-cap companies, engaging in controversial activities is a destroyer of value. Because we often hunt for alpha in the small-to-mid-cap space, applying an ethical screen is not just a moral choice; it is a quality filter that removes companies likely to bleed cash due to reputational headwinds.
Invest With Us








Stop choosing. Start compounding the kind of capital you're proud to own.
We offer digital onboarding with a simple online form — you can have a fully-funded Archalos account in just a few days, custodied at Charles Schwab or Fidelity.